▲ | blooalien 3 days ago | |||||||
Yeah, for sure. Anything trying to be a social network in a properly peer-to-peer fashion would have to be as simple to use (or simpler) than existing social networks, and / or offer some genuinely unique and desirable feature(s) in order to attract any serious critical mass of users. | ||||||||
▲ | cramsession 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Interestingly the original Napster was a pretty good social network! I really liked being able to browse through all of a user's shared files. We should bring something like that back. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | bit1993 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
"Anything trying to be a social network in a properly peer-to-peer fashion would have to be as simple to use..." In practice this issue arise something like this: A decentralized service is launched it is so decentralized the user has to store their own private keys. Later a centralized solution is launched where the user does not have to go through the trouble of storing the private keys, everything is managed for them... everyone joins the centralized service. |