▲ | shusaku a day ago | |||||||
Maybe I am misunderstanding the study but I don’t understand why reading a magazine or newspaper is counted while reading an article on one’s phone is not. | ||||||||
▲ | daedrdev a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I think more interesting is reading a book on a phone doesn't seem to count, which his the main way I read.
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | Gigachad a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The situation gets pretty muddy fast. I don't think many people are doing long form article reading on the internet because it's so incredibly painful. Most news sites are loaded with so many pop ups, sticky elements, and reflowing UI that it's almost impossible to read anything beyond a couple of lines. | ||||||||
▲ | joe_the_user a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
You in fact are misunderstanding the article, reading on an electronic device is included reading for pleasure - it is one of the three categories listed parenthetically as that. Quote: The study focused on two activities: reading for pleasure (reading a book, newspaper, magazine, reading on electronic devices and listening to audiobooks) and reading with children. | ||||||||
|