I'm sure you meant it to be edgy and offensive but it's quite flat in substance - you can't reasonably reduce the population and any means you'd employ to do so would be equally destructive to the environment - you can't change the capitalistic paradigm of energy generation and consumption, without some effort and resources drastically beyond what you've demonstrated here, and you can't ignore economy of scale that is demonstrated particularly with energy generation to insinuate that these solutions must be collocated on premise for them to be viable.