| ▲ | stmw 4 days ago |
| I don't think that follows, esp. since when we're talking about a mature, actively commercially maintained JIT engine. |
|
| ▲ | bawolff 3 days ago | parent [-] |
| Why not? JIT engines are inherently risky. They are great for performance but terrible for security. |
| |
| ▲ | stmw 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Briefly, because overall risk = new inherent risk / (architecture * security reputation * ongoing maintenance investment) Even without arguing over whether JIT engines are inherently risky or add much risk given the modern computing environment is full of them, from graphics to Javascript. |
|
