▲ | Symmetry 2 days ago | |||||||||||||
Solar prices are coming down quite fast, I don't think a factor of two is going to be a killer here if the storage is cheap and long-lasting enough. Some people are already considering over-provisioning solar panels relative to available transformers/grid connections so that they can maintain output on cloudier days. "What do we do with all the extra power when the belly of the Duck Curve [1] hits the ground" is a problem lots of people are thinking about. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | tgtweak 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The cost-prohibitive portion of this, which is greatly glossed over in the article and which I showed in my other reply - is that the steam generator required to recover this heat as electricity, is a massive part of the capex - more than half of the entire system end-to-end, including the solar and dirt storage. That makes the economy of it far less viable even with nearly free solar, which we're still quite far from. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | olejorgenb 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Yeah, but then people should start to actual incorporate the full cost of these kind of things in the total cost of solar power when comparing it to other sources. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | pbhjpbhj 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I think generating hydrogen for fuel cells seems prima facie a reasonable approach? | ||||||||||||||
|