▲ | tim333 4 days ago | |
>The Online Safety Act in particular enjoys extraordinarily high support among the general public does not mean >the average Brit wants and possibly needs the government to tell them how to live their lives The average Brit doesn't want foreign entities pushing porn and self harm / pro suicide stuff to their kids. Can you perhaps see the difference there? I notice most of the outrage in HN is from foreign entities wanting freedom to push whatever. The Brits are ok telling JD Vance et all chill. | ||
▲ | account42 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
It does mean exactly that. If parents want to control what their kids see online they can take control of the situation and limit screen time to where it can be supervised. It might even make sense to have legislation to ensure that that is possible (that schools can't require devices for young children, that device makers need to implement effective parental controls, etc.). But that's not what the OSA is. Instead it's the government deciding how all kids should be parented. And of course it doesn't just affect the kids now because to be effective all adults need to prove they are not kids to view "harmful" materials, with all the chilling effects and collection of sensitive data that that entails. > I notice most of the outrage in HN is from foreign entities wanting freedom to push whatever. Hence the original acknowledgement: > The thing you have to understand is that the average Brit wants and possibly needs the government to tell them how to live their lives. | ||
▲ | throw7 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The Brits can go bugger off and build their own China Firewall™. |