▲ | raffael_de a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
The relevance of beer with regard to water conservation and safe consumption is _not_ because the alcohol sterilizes the fluid. It's because successfully brewed and unfiltered beer forms a relatively stable ecosystem of unproblematic yeasts and lactic acid bacteria which prevent other unsafe micro organisms to take over and multiply. The hop is actually contributing to chemical conservation, though. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | legitster a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Also, beer production started with boiling the water. So in a sense you sterilize the water and the beer helped preserve it for storage. Watering down wine was also common in the era though, and the mechanism there implies the alcohol and acidity of the wine acted as a minor sterilizer. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | IAmBroom 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm not clear what you mean by "contributing to chemical conservation". They don't conserve anything, really. Hops are antibiotic and antifungal in nature. That, combined with their mild flavor (compared to things like wormwood), is why they are synonymous with beer production today. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | card_zero a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Hops came into use relatively recently, I think? Not yet popular in Britain by the 1500s, anyway. Though used in Holland by that point, and possibly the predecessor (a mixture of herbs called gruit) was antibacterial anyway. |