It's also an organization created by Panasonic, SanDisk, and Toshiba. The entire FOSS scene are technically irrelevant to those companies - you might think software like Linux Kernel would be pretty important, but that tech is available to everybody, which makes it just a constant.

Also, this tool exists to fix card errors at field and reduce support costs, not to advocate their superior jutsu of formatting. The latter is not the point.

▲

ok123456 a day ago | parent | next [-]

There was a period of time when linux only supported MMCs (the forerunner standards), because none of the partner members provided updated SD card drivers. This limitation meant you were limited to using older media that capped out at 128MB. This was a significant problem with using Linux on PDAs.

▲

smaudet a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The latter is not the point

On the one hand, I get that and I get that you might not want to take criticism etc on a small utility that you create...

However, on the other hand, if this such a pervasive issue as to merit an official "correct" implementation, then I would think you would want more implementations working correctly, so that your brand behaves more consistently, correctly, across impls.

▲

rollcat a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I wonder how much money have these three companies made from FOSS in the last quarter alone. I guess they don't know either, it's easy to take all of that work for granted.

▲

numpad0 a day ago | parent [-]

They also tend to buy Linux from someone, often MontaVista last I did some Googling long time ago...

The fundamental problem, I think, is that FOSS didn't really take off in Japan the way it did in US/EU, for some reason. There are tons of code-literate engineers but way less who would be sympathetic with developer community building, code sharing, licensing discussions, etc., that are more common in communities from US/EU.

▲

rollcat a day ago | parent | next [-]

Japan is Japan, most of their history can be summarised as isolationism/NIH.

Software developers are also not seen as "real" engineers there. They're just typing words into a computer, right?

▲

smaudet a day ago | parent [-]

That might explain why their software never took off to the same extent that the US's did, despite having been leaders in the hardware space.

You can of course "just program" the same way you can "just build" a car out of plywood and some electric motors, however the presence of an engineering mindset (and tools/resources) is what separates a fire hazard from a Ferrari.

	▲	jsndndd a day ago \| parent [-]
		What exactly separates a fire hazard from a Ferrari? Those vehicles are notoriously unreliable

▲

rbanffy a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> There are tons of code-literate engineers but way less who would be sympathetic with developer community building, code sharing, licensing discussions, etc., that are more common in communities from US/EU

I find these cultural differences very interesting. I wonder why it’s that way. I noticed some lower willingness to share work (and any form of bad news) in more competitive societies, but I’m unsure this would be the case.

Culture eats strategy for breakfast