▲ | fhd2 a day ago | |||||||
Much like wheelchairs vs exo skeletons, the simpler (and cheaper) tech tends to win. I'd imagine in a future where robots are everywhere, they'll use whatever cheap locomotion is appropriate for their tasks, probably predominantly wheels. It's a fun vision to imagine bipedal robots everywhere like in old sci movies, but I'm not convinced that's how it'll play out, the economics don't make that much sense. Bipedal robots are more expensive to develop, build and maintain, more limited in their payloads, and because of the additional complexity, less reliable. | ||||||||
▲ | throwawayqqq11 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Cost will be the reason why these over engineered robots fail. Cost is the reason why indoor vertical farms fail, even though in their case, the environment is controlled and the tech is relatively simple compared to omnipotent field robots. The most viable use case of AI is bullshiting humans, which is still a multi-billion market. Infrastructure hooray! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | Mountain_Skies a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Reminds me of some of the early designs imagined for automatic dishwashers which had articulated arms and hands. The dishwashers we have are nothing like what was envisioned by those early designs. It just takes some time to break out of the pattern of thinking that the recent past imposed due to the technology of that time. |