|
| ▲ | rurp a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| > There has been dozens of examples of tech companies losing money for years just to become highly profitable after. Sure, but there have been thousands of tech companies that lost money year over year and went bust. Odds are that any given AI company will end up losing a lot of money. Maybe the asymmetric potential payoff is worth the risk in certain cases, but it's not crazy to be skeptical about Anthropic or any other hot company. |
| |
| ▲ | aurareturn 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure, but there have been thousands of tech companies that lost money year over year and went bust. Odds are that any given AI company will end up losing a lot of money. Maybe the asymmetric potential payoff is worth the risk in certain cases, but it's not crazy to be skeptical about Anthropic or any other hot company.
That's the game. It's called the power law in VC investing. It's worked. |
|
|
| ▲ | 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | tobias3 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That depends on the regulators being asleep on the wheel again and letting monopolies happen. At the minimum here in Europe they'd automatically fall under Digital Services Act. According to OpenAI they have 41.3 million average monthly active recipients in the European Union. Only a few million more and they fall under DSA. That is if US sanctions don't kill the DSA. |
