Remix.run Logo
noduerme 7 days ago

I don't think your comment should be downvoted. Children viewing porn is a legitimate problem. The other problem is that adults should not be forced to share their identity to view content - particularly that which might be used to blackmail them. I don't have children. And I don't think your children outweigh my right to privacy.

dijit 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

It’s really not though.

It’s not like the internet was censored when I was coming up, and I don’t think less of kids today than I do of myself.

Kids stumbling across something when browsing innocently isn’t really a major issue, and if they seek it out: they will find it, you won’t stop them, kids are smarter than you think (just, immature and unwise).

The best method, honestly, is for parents to be forethcoming..

however you have now successfully reframed the discussion into “what about the kids”, when in reality it’s about getting everyone’s ID so that they can better enforce their draconian internet comment laws… the government even outright said this. https://archive.is/3pave

if the government really cared about protecting children, they would’ve made a freely available child protection software that anyone can install in their home network, or subsidised its deployment at ISPs as an advertised opt-in.

Nursie 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

Honest question - when were you "coming up" and are you sure it didn't do anyone any harm then?

I'm mid-late 40s and the internet was not really there when I was growing up. Someone ten years younger than me would have much more porn available to them, easily, in the home during their formative years. But even since then it's likely become more pervasive and present by an order of magnitude, and people have connected devices with them all the time in a way they wouldn't have back then.

We also have lots of academics saying that porn is changing attitudes to sex and what is acceptable behaviour (the rise of choking, for instance).

So it seems reasonable to ask the question, not whether today's kids are vulnerable to harms we weren't vulnerable to, but have things changed significantly in the intervening years?

Note - I'm not defending the clusterfuck that is the OSA. But the world is not always as it was.

dijit 7 days ago | parent [-]

No, thats totally fair.

I’m 35 now, so in the 00’s I had my entire pre-teen and teenage years.

My brother and sisters are 26, 28 and 33- we aren’t worse than our parents (we have 3 different mothers between us) or grandparents from a mental health or moral perspective; and we were all exposed to liveleak and 4chan in various ways.

I’m not sure how else to measure to he honest with you.

Flere-Imsaho 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> subsidised its deployment at ISPs as an advertised opt-in.

The thing is, the tech and infra for this is already out there. For example DNS services that offer adult-website filtering. The cost to implement this at the ISP level really wouldn't cost much (at at technological level).

Levitz 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just because we don't want children to do something doesn't mean the state should impose upon all of its population a norm to control their actions, and I don't think anyone pretending otherwise has a valid or respectable opinion.

mschuster91 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Children viewing porn is a legitimate problem

Is it? Children viewing porn has been a thing ever since the invention of the printing press, or at the very least, ever since the first Playboy got printed.

noduerme 7 days ago | parent [-]

Were those videos? No. Did they depict sex acts? No. It's qualitatively different. I was raised in an extremely liberal household full of Playboy mags, looking at photos of naked women since I was 5 years old. The violence of what is today mainstram porn would have been extremely fringe, and probably impossible to find outside an underground video group for sadists. I have no real problem with kids looking at nudes. That is not this. Porn has pushed itself into dementia chasing shock value. Seeing a blowjob photo was something a child could encounter in the early 90s, maybe a very sophisticated child with very early access to all the dark shit on the early internet. If you spent hours figuring out how to find one. But maybe you'd see one or two. Seeing a woman being gang raped, choked and beaten, "consentually"? That's a new problem. It is a real problem, and it doesn't matter whether it's shown to a child on a website or on a home VCR, it's enormously corrupting and there absolutely is a societal harm in allowing it to happen. The question is how to prevent that harm without depriving adults of their rights and liberties, not whether such a thing is harmful to a child's future ability to form healthy relationships.

mschuster91 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Seeing a woman being gang raped, choked and beaten, "consentually"? That's a new problem.

That is not that new either, BDSM has been a thing for decades. "Histoire d'O" for example came out in 1975, the literary work it's based on is even older. And the panic back then about these books is exactly the same kind of bullshit we're seeing today.

> The question is how to prevent that harm without depriving adults of their rights and liberties, not whether such a thing is harmful to a child's future ability to form healthy relationships.

Teach your kids about sexuality from early age. That also helps cutting down on cases of sexual abuse - think of all the clergy and sports trainer scandals. A lot of these failed prosecution or went on far too long because the kids lacked the vocabulary to describe what happened to them, or didn't recognize that what they went through was wrong.

The problem is, anything veering into this direction is immediately attacked by Conservatives, religious extremists and the likes.

lupusreal 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

You've strayed considerably from your initial argument of contraband playboys being prevalent before the internet. Playboys were prevalent, yes, but not magazines with graphic depictions of violent fetishes. That such magazines existed at all isn't disputed.

druskacik 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> BDSM has been a thing for decades

But decades ago it was not possible to reach content like that in a few seconds, using magical device we carry 24/7.

noduerme 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I was taught about sexuality from a very early age, by very liberal and loving parents, which was extremely unusual even in one of the most liberal places on earth. And that involved seeing sex scenes and nude images and completely open conversations about sex acts, anything I wanted to ask. Above all, they stressed respect, consent and health.

Parents now would probably be arrested and their kids end up in foster care for giving their children a similar education.

What did not exist in that that time was the avalanche of extreme content that has become mainstream and accessible to the point that it would even overwhelm my own parents' teaching methods, let alone those of most parents who were much less open or equipped to have such conversations.

I encountered BDSM porn around the time I was 12, and was groomed over IRC by an adult posing as a minor who wanted to have sex (this was 1992). That person sent me VHS tapes in brown boxes through the mail. I can't stress how extreme and unusual this was at that time, and I'm lucky I had the parents I had.

My rationale for thinking that this is a problem is that (1) most parents do not prepare their kids for this, and (2) such a thing becoming commonplace is a massive societal burden that will result in psychological damage not just to individual kids, but to their own offspring and to society as a whole.

Letting children see nude pix in Playboy and explaining to them how sex works has been considered taboo and borderline abuse since I was a kid in the 80s, but my parents did it anyway. I agree with you that educating your kids is the best way to protect them from real abuse. But in this context, the outside world has to be considered all groomers and abusers. The world is full of pedophiles and people who want to take advantage of others. Porn sites and the infiltration of extreme BDSM into the mainstream are examples of this. I stress that it's fine for adults and no adult should have their private lives pried into by any government. I'm just saying that there is a real problem, societally, with allowing kids to be exposed to the lusts of random people on the internet, and that problem will compound over time until you have a society like Russia or Appalachia where everyone is raped at 12 and rapes children when they're adults. In other words, a death spiral.

throwaway2037 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

    > The violence of what is today mainstram porn would have been extremely fringe
I want to push back against some of this comment. I would argue that for non-boomers, today's mainstream porn is most likely OnlyFans, where women have greater control than ever over adult content being created.

    > Seeing a woman being gang raped, choked and beaten
This is a tiny, tiny fraction of adult content. The rest of your comment reads like "clutching your pearls" to me.
celsoazevedo 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> I don't think your comment should be downvoted. Children viewing porn is a legitimate problem.

The thing is, in the UK, porn websites are already blocked by default by most ISPs and mobile networks. Only the account owner can unblock that content, either by calling the provider or by changing something in their account settings. And yes, you'll need to verify that you're an adult if you signed up to the service without providing them with details (possible with some mobile providers).

This has been the case for the past 10 or so years, so why exactly do we need this age verification stuff?