▲ | inemesitaffia 7 days ago | |||||||
Their parent can apply blocks on their devices is what I'd tell you. Because these are ultimately excuses for spying on adults | ||||||||
▲ | antihero 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Perhaps a better implementation of the law would be requiring all sites to mark content as NSFW if it is, and having opt-in device level toggles, so parents could protect their kids more easily, but anyone who’s actively seeking the content is able to. Teenagers will get around this ridiculous verification with ease either way. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | _Algernon_ 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
This argument is basically the same as saying that stores should be allowed to sell alcohol to kids because it's the parents' responsibility to guard the store so their kids don't buy it. Kids do not only have access to their own devices (for one, these days schools provide them with devices that parents have little say over often with only trivial filtering). And that is assuming the best case scenario where parents have the technical know-how to put in place non-trivial limits. Most don't. | ||||||||
|