> the US has no leverage to demand 10% of healthcare companies' stocks

The US government doesn't need leverage. It just needs an act of Congress. Corporations are convenient fictions that exist at the pleasure of our legal system, which can be changed.

▲

aspenmayer 4 days ago | parent [-]

I agree that this could be done as it has happened before, but I don’t think anyone would go quietly. It’s expropriation without pay or eminent domain if it’s with pay, but I would expect a Supreme Court challenge if Congress came anywhere near this, either way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprises_of_the...

▲

hakfoo 3 days ago | parent [-]

A nifty play would just be "the corporate veil is no longer free. Issue the state stock for a 49% stake, or your investors have unlimited liability." Then there's a theoretical "trade" but virtually nobody's going to say no.

▲

aspenmayer 3 days ago | parent [-]

In such a scenario, the US gov is only ~2% away from a 51% attack hostile takeover against any/every public company, depending on the kind of shares.

This is not likely.

▲

hakfoo a day ago | parent [-]

That's the goal. Right now, public companies are far too governed by people who want the business to succeed at all costs.

The state could represent interests like "keeping high-paid jobs on-shore" or "avoid legal/labour/environmental standard arbitrage" that regular investors won't vote for.

	▲	bdangubic a day ago \| parent [-]
		works for venezuela and all other commie countries so you know, why don’t we try to become that too :)