People keep saying that Gemini 2.5 Pro can solve some problem that Sonnet 4 cannot, or that GPT5 can solve a problem that Gemini 2.5 Pro cannot, or that Sonnet 4 can solve some problem that GPT5 cannot.

There was a blog article about mixing together different agents into the same conversation, taking turns at responses and improving results/correctness. But it takes a lot of effort to make your own claude-code-clone with correct API for each provider and prompts tuned for those models and tool use integrated etc. And there's no incentive for Anthropic/OpenAI/Google to write this tool for us.

OTOH it would be relatively easy for the bash loop to call claude code, codex CLI, etc in a loop to get the same benefit. If one iteration of one tool gets stuck, perhaps another LLM will take a different approach and everything can get back on track.

Just a thought.

> it takes a lot of effort to make your own claude-code-clone

Maybe we could try write that into a markdown file, and let Claude code at it for one night in a while loop

> People keep saying that Gemini 2.5 Pro can solve some problem that Sonnet 4 cannot

Most definitely can. It's insane how well just telling Claude to ask help from Gemini works in practice.

https://github.com/raine/consult-llm-mcp

Disclaimer: made it

https://github.com/albertvucinovic/chat.sh