You can (equivalently) distribute some specific libc.so with your application. I don't think anyone other than GNU maximalists believes this infects your application with the (L)GPL.

▲

Retr0id 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

You'd need to distribute ld.so also, otherwise you'll run into ld/libc incompatibilities.

▲

loeg 2 days ago | parent [-]

Sure.

	▲	account42 a day ago \| parent [-]
		... and ld.so needs to be at a specific absolute path so you can't just distribute it along with your application, you need to use an actual container for this.

▲

cxr 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

"GNU maximalist" is an odd choice of wording, since it would seem to imply people who are the most well-informed about the project's licenses, but anyone who thinks that distributing an LGPL library without your own app's corresponding source code is someone who flat out doesn't understand the LGPL.

	▲	cxr 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		A mistake in my own wording crept in here; this should have said: > one who thinks that distributing an LGPL library without your own app's corresponding source code is forbidden is someone who flat out doesn't understand the LGPL