▲ | aaviator42 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An argument for a better defined file format specification perhaps, but I don't think it's necessarily a good thing for everyone to use or have to use the same implementation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | socalgal2 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As someone who works on specs that are shared across different organizations' implementations, you can write all the specs you want but no conformance tests = no conformance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Muromec 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If everyone has the same parser the whole classes of bugs just stop being exploitable. The classic one being one parser at the edge validates somethhing and the further down the line sees another result which it expects tp be rejected during validation. Both parsers could be buggy, but when they have different kinds of bugs, you get a zero click undetectable exploit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|