▲ | sgarland 4 days ago | |||||||
Yes, yes it does [0]. I fully understand the need for backwards-compatibility given the sheer number of SQLite installations, I find their attitude towards flexible types [1] appalling. At least they’ve added STRICT. Similarly, the fact that FKs aren’t actually enforced by default is a horrifying discovery if you’re new to it, but tbf a. MySQL until quite recently allowed CHECK constraints to be declared, which it then ignored b. The FK enforcement decision is for backwards-compatibility. | ||||||||
▲ | sevensor 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I disagree about flexible types. SQLite bills itself as a better fopen, not as a full on database engine. If you have data sitting outside your application, trusting it to be well typed is just going to cause trouble. If your database is the application, that’s a different story. | ||||||||
|