| |
| ▲ | akk0 4 days ago | parent [-] | | That seems like a leaky implementation detail to me, for a published piece. | | |
| ▲ | mg74 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You should learn to be grateful for what other people do on their own time and demand nothing from you for you to benefit from it. | | |
| ▲ | crazygringo 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | On the other hand, when we critique, it is for the benefit of everyone who reads the critique and learns from it. That's why critique has value. To the original author/artist (if they see it), but also to everyone else who sees it. "Oh, I was going to intersperse text slides with a transcript, but I remember how offputting that was once on HN, so let's skip the slides." | | |
| ▲ | jsnell 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Text slides interspersed with the transcript work great normally. But this is mostly slides with just four words of content, and a transcript that just be repeats the same words. |
| |
| ▲ | aiaizbba 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The article in question is written by a person who stands to benefit heavily from AI & agents succeeding. They appear to be a true believer so this isn’t a disparaging comment, but a snake oil salesman would display the same behavior. | |
| ▲ | ghuntley 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanks, mate. |
| |
| ▲ | JamesSwift 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I look forward to anything I see ghuntley post, and Ive gotten a lot of benefit from his contributions especially in the .net space, but I have to agree here. The format was distracting and really affected my ability to read it. I havent seen the live version, but I have a feeling the slide deck format would also be distracting (2-4 words per slide is really not communicating ideas effectively when you need all the words to form the sentence). |
|
|
