▲ | fleventynine 4 days ago | |||||||
Does anyone know what it looks like when you use a line scan camera to take a picture of the landscape from a moving car or train? I suspect the parallax produces some interesting distortions. | ||||||||
▲ | dllu 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I've taken a couple of pics from a moving train... Nankai 6000 series, Osaka: https://i.dllu.net/nankai_19b8df3e827215a2.jpg Scenery in France: https://i.dllu.net/preview_l_b01915cc69f35644.png Marseille, France: https://i.dllu.net/preview_raw_7292be4e58de5cd0.png California: https://i.dllu.net/preview_raw_d5ec50534991d1a4.png https://i.dllu.net/preview_raw_e06b551444359536.png Sorry for the purple trees. The camera is sensitive to near infrared, in which trees are highly reflective, and I haven't taken any trains since buying an IR cut filter. Some of these also have dropped frames and other artifacts. | ||||||||
▲ | dddw 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Exactly what wanted to know. Is it technically feasible to 'scan' a whole landcape of lets say an hour long trainride? | ||||||||
▲ | notatoad 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It’s just a blur. Like the background of the photos in this article. You can get some cool distortions at very slow speeds, but at car or train speeds you won’t see anything | ||||||||
|