"If that happens" is still an "if", but, I mean, Republicans are actively working on that as we speak.

Source? I haven’t seen anything about it and I just googled again and still don’t see anything (though that could be Google’s fault).

I think legally it is possible since Supreme Court decisions are applied retroactively in general (just not the existing EO one because the EO was forward looking), but that would be super unpopular since it’s basically a huge rug pull and I’m skeptical they would do it.

▲

FireBeyond 2 days ago | parent [-]

I don’t know how it would apply retroactively but as a principle? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c983g6zpz28o

	▲	pfannkuchen a day ago \| parent [-]
		Right so the thing that happened already they were working on before it happened, I agree. It seems like you are agitated about this and jumping to unsupported conclusions?