Some kind of trouble one way or the other.

Strong link trouble or weak link trouble :)?

In any case..

I hope TW Körner doesn't have that last footnote on the topic..

(Fwiw left/right (meta-)division seems to me to encompass all the moral taxonomies of the day, TWK just happened to settle for rich/smart vs social wrt UK)

>Social Darwinism applies the Darwinian doctrine of survival of the fittest to human society. Rich social Darwinists take wealth as the best indication of fitness to survive, academic social Darwinists take intellectual achievements as the best indication and so on. They are often haunted by the fear that the unfit do not understand this and may outbreed the fit.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24154247