▲ | mnahkies 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I saw what I thought was a nice talk a couple of years ago at fosdem introducing the topic https://archive.fosdem.org/2024/schedule/event/fosdem-2024-1... Even when running on bare metal I think the concept of measurements and attestations that attempt to prove it hasn't been tampered with are valuable, unless perhaps you also have direct physical control (eg: it's in a server room in your own building) Looking forward to public clouds maturing their support for Nvidia's confidential computing extensions as that seems like one of the bigger gaps remaining | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | louwrentius 5 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don't believe in the validity of the idea of 'confidential computing' on a fundamental level. Yes, there are degrees of risk and you can pretend that the risks of third-parties running hardware for you are so reduced / mitigated due to 'confidential computing' it's 'secure enough'. I understand things can be a trade-off. Yet I still feel 'confidential computing' is an elaborate justification that decision makers can point to, to keep the status quo and even do more things in the cloud. | |||||||||||||||||
|