|
| ▲ | jdiff 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's perplexing, to put it generously, but it doesn't throw the semantics of the entire sentence into question. |
|
| ▲ | crazygringo 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| For all we know the document is from two decades ago. |
| |
| ▲ | jdiff 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Two decades ago makes the GenZ reference confusing, as the very oldest of them by the most generous definition would be only 9 years old. With a span across 50 years, that range from Gen X to Gen Z is just awkward to place as "young buyers of Monster" at any point in time. |
|
