How confident are people that Omarchy will be well maintained in the future?

I'm considering making that same switch from MacOS to Arch, but I'm not sure if I should have confidence in something like Omarchy which is relatively new.

▲

dismalaf 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Why does it need to be maintained? It's just an install script to install common apps on Arch and to install and configure Hyprland. It's not really a distro on its own.

	▲	weikju a day ago \| parent [-]
		Hyprland might change. Other apps that are installed or even compiled might go stale or change. The chaotic-aur in use might change or need replacing. Arch or upstream packages might make changes causing issues eg some recent issue with a session manager that broke a lot of installs. Etc.

▲

machomaster 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

DHH made Omarchy the official developer distro/setup in his company, so it has the support of the stable commercial entity known for its support of open source projects.

▲

chrisvalleybay 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

If we look at how involved DHH has been with Rails since its inception, I trust Omarchy will follow the same path. This is his daily driver, and I don't think that will change after what happened with 37Signals vs. Apple.

	▲	bcye 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Adding to this, they are moving all developers at 37Signals over over the next few years, so I figure it will be quite maintained.