Omarchy never made much sense to me. The biggest benefit of Arch is that it's hackable and you can set it up exactly as you want it.. so why skip the entire process that teaches you how to do that?

▲

runjake 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Because some of us want that minimalism and a good “power user” default setup to tweak from there. I spent all of the 90s learning Linux deeply and custom tweaking everything and trying everything posted to freshmeat.net. I bootstrapped my own Linux from scratch before LFS was a thing.

Now I just want to get work down on an OS that feels like it belongs to power users and closely matches my deployment targets.

This is why I switched to Omarchy.

▲

AstroBen 3 days ago | parent [-]

In that case it for sure makes sense, but for the user like the writer who is new to linux?

I'm very happy I went through the pain of setting everything up from scratch. It taught me how it all works. I just don't see how I'd get that same knowledge ever with Omarchy

▲

runjake 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's just my experience, but it seems like nearly all younger people (<= 20s) don't want to deep dive on stuff like Linux or TCP/IP, they want to know enough to be effective (dangerous?) and move onto chasing basic competency in the next technology.

I can from a time when sysadmins were expected to know C and kernel and TCP/IP internals, but that world is no more. Blame it on education, blame it on the pace of technology, I don't know.

I'm not sure how I feel about that, especially thinking about when all the people who know and can build low-level stuff retire and die off. Maybe AI will save them. Who knows?

▲

TiredOfLife 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not everyone wants that deep of a knowledge.

Not everyone has a spare machine to tinker with.

With Omarchy you get a working good looking OS with thought out defaults and built in themes. It's ready to use, but can be customized.

	▲	runjake 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Yep, these were my points, too. To think, back in the 70s/80s before Minix and Linux, many of us had to do illegal things to even get access to computers running UNIX. The entry barrier was high and risky, and so was the desire to learn.

▲

cosmic_cheese 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think people like Arch because it serves the purpose of blank slate pretty well and doesn’t have ancient package problems. It’s easier to build something like Omarchy for Arch than it would be for more opinionated distros.

▲

eviks 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why waste time getting what you want starting from the bad defaults when you can do exactly the same starting with better defaults set up by someone else?

▲

dismalaf 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Meh, I use LazyVim with Neovim. It's the same deal. I like Neovim but don't want to bother configuring it when someone else has a much nicer setup and are sharing it.

Hyprland and desktop ricing is the desktop equivalent of configuring your editor.