| ▲ | cbzbc 4 days ago |
| runit doesn't propagate SIGTERM to services it starts. |
|
| ▲ | kragen 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Hmm, is that desirable? If someone's going around sending SIGTERM to random processes they might also send SIGKILL, and there's no way Nitro can propagate SIGKILL to processes it starts. |
| |
| ▲ | cbzbc 3 days ago | parent [-] | | It does, because SIGTERM is traditionally understood as the trigger for a shutdown. Docker - for instance - will send a SIGTERM to pid 1 when a container is stopped - which goes back to a previous comment here about using a real init as pid 1 if the thing in your container forks: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44990092 | | |
| ▲ | kragen 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Interesting! I didn't know that—I thought that when you told sysvinit to change its runlevel you normally used some slightly richer interface than signals. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | atahanacar 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It does if you use SIGHUP. |