| ▲ | dragonwriter 3 days ago |
| Because the government having a financial interest in Intel’s success is expected by the market to result in the government acting in Intel’s interest, in order to profit. |
|
| ▲ | gmd63 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| You would think the US government would be interested in the US government's success, but the past eight months have proven starkly otherwise. What makes one think they will be looking out for Intel's interests any better? |
| |
| ▲ | dllthomas 2 days ago | parent [-] | | How can you say they don't care about success? When they got bad numbers they immediately fired the person responsible. | | |
| ▲ | gmd63 a day ago | parent [-] | | Just in case you aren't joking, they did not fire the person responsible for the bad numbers. They fired the person responsible for observing and reporting them. | | |
| ▲ | dllthomas 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was joking, although it was a gesture at a real thing. I don't know how much they don't care about success, versus caring but being deeply confused about how to reach it, versus in some sense "caring" but prioritizing other things. But regardless, retaliation against bearers of bad news is a great way to horrifically mismanage an organization, and we seem to be seeing it repeatedly from this administration, and it is alarming. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | artursapek 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They also have a national security interest as well. |
