> pedestrianizing more of the city

Replacing dangerous, dirty, noisy cars with safe, clean, and quiet ones seems like a huge pedestrianizing step.

What's a "low traffic neighborhood"? Does that allow busses or deliveries?

It’s a step in the right direction, but they still pollute (heavy electric vehicles have a lot more tire dust) and take up a lot space (could close roads and build housing or just have more space for the millions of city residents that don’t have/use cars).

LTN still allow buses, emergency vehicles, deliveries, etc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Traffic_Neighbourhood

▲

xnx 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> heavy electric vehicles have a lot more tire dust

It would be interesting to know the fleet-level statistics for this. Driven by humans, EV might wear tires faster because of fast starts and the extra weight during stops. It's possible that the Waymo Driver accelerates and decelerates more smoothly, resulting in less tire wear than a human-driven ICE vehicle.

	▲	meagher 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		That would be great! Even if EV pollution is zero, cars still take up a lot of space in a city where space is very limited.

▲

bryanlarsen 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

EV's have less tire & brake dust than ICE vehicles. https://ev.com/news/study-reveals-evs-produce-less-brake-and...

▲

NewJazz 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

EVs usually produce much less brake dust, not more, than combustion vehicles.

	▲	Scoundreller 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		More tire dust on EVs tho cuz of the added weight and ability to accelerate a lot faster. EVs can really chew through tires. Brake dust composition is improving tho: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/copper-free-brake-initiative
	▲	meagher 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Thanks for the correction. Updated.