> generally supported by the voters

you could say the same about the US... that doesn't make it right and it doesn't mean people aren't violently voting against their own best interests.

▲

o11c 3 days ago | parent [-]

It's a huge stretch to call the existence of 4chan in anyone's best interests.

First they came for 4chan and I said nothing, because good riddance!

This is not a slippery slope; this is a spring trying to return to the center. The harder the resistance at the extremes, the more energetic the oscillation will be, so if we want to minimize that, work on undermining the intolerable extremes.

The sheer anarchy of the libertarian mindset that much of this site supports is not a good thing.

▲

ranger_danger 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> It's a huge stretch to call the existence of 4chan in anyone's best interests.

I wasn't trying to imply that at all... I just meant that voting for age verification laws themselves were against peoples' best interest, not the blocking of any particular website.

In any case... sites like 4chan itself existing (ignoring any actual moderation issues like CP/etc. or other clearly illegal stuff), to me, simply means that free speech still exists, and I will defend their (anyone's) right to exist and to free speech if I have to. It doesn't mean I agree with/support them or their content though.

	▲	o11c 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]

▲

m-s-y 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>It's a huge stretch to call the existence of 4chan in anyone's best interests.

Absolutely, 100% incorrect. You obviously don't approve of 4chan's content or mission, but that's not the point. It benefits everyone when anyone takes a stand because their legal rights are under attack.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

>This is not a slippery slope

Again, incorrect.

Any type of punishment for 4chan due to their legal content is damn close to the definition of "slippery slope". You're familiar with the "anti-slippery slope" argument already ("First they came for 4chan and I said nothing, because good riddance!"), so you're obviously cogent enough to understand what you're saying.

>The sheer anarchy of the libertarian mindset that much of this site supports is not a good thing.

This is not for you to decide. Your mindset is why free speech laws must exist in the first place.

	▲	o11c 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		The whole point of this is that what counts as "legal" is permitted to change. In particular, "legal under some circumstances" is a thing.