▲ | merelysounds 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> the article didn't seem to explain how the prompt injection was actually done... There is a short explanation in the “Nyquist’s nightmares” paragraph and a link to a related paper. “This aliasing effect is a consequence of the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem. Exploiting this ambiguity by manipulating specific pixels such that a target pattern emerges is exactly what image scaling attacks do. Refer to Quiring et al[1]. for a more detailed explanation.” [1]: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec20fall_quiring_prepub... | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | privatelypublic 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Except it has nothing to do with N-S sampling theorem. Mentioning it at all is an extremely obnoxious red-herring. Theres no sine-wave to digitize here. Its taking a large image, and manipulating the bicubic downsampling algorithm so they get the artifacts they want. At very specific resolutions at that. | |||||||||||||||||
|