This article can be taken a little less seriously. It is just an opinion/experience of a person.

I think he has a lot of good points there. Yes he treads on the thin ice with the very big statements and generalisations, but those we don't have to "sign under with blood".

I do like the simple formula concept. It does make sense. It's not an ultimate representation of everything, but it's a nice idea of how to frame the differences between the logics we are dealing with.

I choose to not commit the whole message of the article to my core beliefs, but I'll borrow thoughts, ideas for the debates and work ahead.