| ▲ | dns_snek 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
We really need to add some kind of risk to people making these claims to make it more interesting. I listened to the type of advice you're giving here on more occasions than I can remember, at least once for every major revision of every major LLM and always walked away frustrated because it hindered me more than it helped. > This is actually amazing now, just use [insert ChatGPT, GPT-4, 4.5, 5, o1, o3, Deepseek, Claude 3.5, 3.9, Gemini 1, 1.5, 2, ...] it's completely different from Model(n-1) you've tried. I'm not some mythical 140 IQ 10x developer and my work isn't exceptional so this shouldn't happen. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ramesh31 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The dark secret no one from the big providers wants to admit is that Claude is the only viable coding model. Everything else descends into a mess of verbose spaghetti full of hallucinations pretty quickly. Claude is head and shoulders above the rest and it isn't even remotely close, regardless of what any benchmark says. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||