| ▲ | tucnak 3 days ago |
| Name-dropping Baudrillard based on Youtube videos is real rich... in irony. |
|
| ▲ | therobots927 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| In case you didn’t notice the parent comment specifically said Baudrillards writing was hard to follow. This channel is run by a philosophy PhD who explains his work. You think he’s misrepresenting baudrillards work I’m guessing? |
| |
| ▲ | tucnak 3 days ago | parent [-] | | It's just funny; philosophy YouTube is a simulacrum in its own right. On a different note, I don't think Baudrillard is worth reading in 2025. I would rather recommend Mark Fisher, but then again it's all gravy, baby. To call all this pop literature "philosophy," especially post-Wittgenstein is a bit silly after all. | | |
| ▲ | therobots927 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yeah I’m gonna read Fisher’s book. I’ve watched a couple of his lectures on YouTube. I don’t really have the mental bandwidth outside work to get really into nitty gritty philosophy. But stuff that’s digestible and helps me contextualize this twilight zone timeline we’re in is nice. I don’t know what good it does to go down the rabbit hole when the vast majority of people aren’t joining you. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
