▲ | lewdwig 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I have such a huge nerd crush on this guy. Witnessing the incredible skill of making even the most humble and obsolete of technologies seem like an absolute pinnacle of human ingenuity is always a pleasure. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | pjerem 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I actually think that "old tech" is pinnacle of human ingenuity. When you see the inside of a camcorder, or a VCR as per his latest videos, those were object humans had to design not only for aesthetics but also for their function. I'm not sure I'm clear but now, I feel like everything is just a randomly designed box stuffed with circuit boards. And more importantly, I really frequently feel like most objects I buy today are never tested by real people before being sent to production lines. If it was the case, somebody, somewhere would have noticed that a tactile snooze button alongside the buttons to change the hour on an alarm clock is stupid, or that the screen is too bright for you to sleep. When objects were a complex arrangement of things that moved smartly together to create a function, the people designing had to test them. They also had to think actively about ergonomics because there were real constraints to solve in creating a camcorder that you can use with only one hand so you'd better place the buttons in an ergonomic place. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Finnucane 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Because at the time it may have been the pinnacle of ingenuity. Engineers had to figure out a new thing, or a way to do a thing in certain constraints, with what they had on hand, and had to be clever about it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|