None. Don't anthropomorphize at all. Note that "understanding" has now been removed from the HN title but not the linked pdf.

▲

platypii 3 days ago | parent [-]

Why not? We are trying to evaluate AI's capabilities. It's OBVIOUS that we should compare it to our only prior example of intelligence -- humans. Saying we shouldn't compare or anthropomorphize machine is a ridiculous hill to die on.

	▲	sema4hacker 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		If you are comparing the performance of a computer program with the performance of a human, then using terms implying they both "understand" wrongly implies they work in the same human-like way, and that ends up misleading lots of people, especially those who have no idea (understanding!) how these models work. Great for marketing, though.