| ▲ | Feuilles_Mortes 4 days ago |
| But you have to know about ruff. I didn't, but I did know about uv. |
|
| ▲ | wasabi991011 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not really. If you know about uv, you know how to use "uv tool run", so you know how to use any formatter of your choice (which you can find easily on Google, arguably easier than reading the documentation and learning about uv format). |
| |
| ▲ | IshKebab 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | He said "you have to know about ruff". You're not really refuting that by saying "no you don't, you can just google it". | |
| ▲ | jamienicol 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | But I don’t know what the formatter of choice is. Nor do I care what it is. I just want to format my code |
|
|
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Well, it is arguably worse to run an unknown, not version pinned, unconfigured formatter over your code and expect it to improve things, unless the code is an utter catastrophe in terms of formatting. |
| |
| ▲ | wiseowise 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It is completely irrelevant. You’re offloading responsibility to uv devs in this case. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 4 days ago | parent [-] | | _You_ may find it irrelevant, but speak for yourself. I don't want dependencies, that are not version-pinned and checksummed running over my code. It is certainly not irrelevant to me. | | |
| ▲ | wiseowise 4 days ago | parent [-] | | That’s for uv for decide. If you don’t like what it does - don’t use uv. |
|
|
|