| ▲ | Wowfunhappy 6 days ago |
| IMO the freight companies should be able to pay to build longer sidings if they need them, but they should have to pay for it. |
|
| ▲ | tschwimmer 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| They're not going to build a 4 mile siding, which is the length that many freight operate at. At that point it's like building a second set of tracks. |
| |
| ▲ | Wowfunhappy 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Then don't build 4 mile trains. It needs to be possible for trains to pass each other. |
|
|
| ▲ | bluGill 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| a lot of rail is 2 track so no sidings are needed. |
| |
| ▲ | guappa 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Because trains never go the other direction anyway. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Dual track isn’t really a two way road, with signaling it ends up being infinite sidings, and is used almost more for passing than for two-way traffic - if it exists outside cities. Unfortunately much of the USA is single or effectively single tracked. |
|
|