It sounds like it's a B2B SaaS product that's gone through multiple pivots with very weak guidance on product on every step.

Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but it's a very common way for things to go wrong.

▲

jmuguy 4 days ago | parent [-]

There's just something about the specifics that seems really odd to me. "60% of features"... really? Sixty percent, specifically? Like I think this story is maybe based on some series of events at a SaaS and I agree with you in principle but it seems like the author ran it through a Linkedin thought leader LLM.

	▲	mvdtnz 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		60% of the features in a product small enough to rewrite in 2 weeks is probably 3 features.