Having a human read a summary is way faster than getting them to write it. If they want to edit it, they can.

AI today is terrible at replacing humans, but OK at enhancing them.

Everyone who gets that is going to find gains - real gains, and fast - and everyone who doesn't, is going to end up spending a lot of money getting into an almost irreversible mistake.

"Reading a summary is faster, so enhancing humans with AI is going to receive boons or busts to the implementer."

Now, summary, or original? (Provided the summary is intentionally vague to a fault, for arguments sake on my end).