| ▲ | OtherShrezzing 5 days ago |
| I don't see how this works, as the costs of running inference is so much higher than the revenues earned by the frontier labs. Anthropic and OpenAI don't continue to exist long-term in a world where GPT-5 and Claude 4.1 cost-quality models are SOTA. |
|
| ▲ | HDThoreaun 5 days ago | parent [-] |
| With gpt5 I’m not sure this is true. Certainly openAI is still losing money but if they stopped research and just focused on productionizing inference use cases I think they’d be profitable. |
| |
| ▲ | criddell 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | But would they be profitable enough? They've taken on more than $50 billion of investment. I think it's relatively easy for Meta to plow billions into AI. Last quarter their revenue was something like $15 billion. Open AI will be lucky to generate that over the next year. | | |
| ▲ | HDThoreaun 5 days ago | parent [-] | | meta net profit last quarter was over $18 billion so yea the big tech players definitely have a lot more runway |
| |
| ▲ | epicureanideal 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > if they stopped research and just focused on productionizing inference use cases I think they’d be profitable For a couple of years, until someone who did keep doing research pulled ahead a bit with a similarly good UI. |
|