All that said, I'm very keen on companies telling me how much of their codebase was written by AI.

I just won't use that information in quite the excitable, optimistic way they offer it.

NoMoreNicksLeft 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I want to have the model re-write patent applications, and if any portion of your patent filing was replicated by it your patent is denied as obvious and derivative.

▲

jihadjihad 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

"...just raised a $20M Series B and are looking to expand the team and products offered. We are fully bought-in to generative AI — over 40% of our codebase is built and maintained by AI, and we expect this number to continue to grow as the tech evolves and the space matures."

"What does your availability over the next couple of weeks look like to chat about this opportunity?"

	▲	jraph 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		"Yeah, quite busy over the next couple of weeks actually… the next couple of decades, really - awful how quickly time fills by itself these days, right? I'd have contributed towards lowering that 40% number which seems contrary to your goals anyway. But here's my card, should you need help with debugging something tricky some time in the near future and nobody manages to figure it out internally. I may be able to make room for you if you can afford it. I might be VERY busy though."