▲ | Amorymeltzer 3 days ago | |||||||
In terms of the "Why Mavericks?" section, >I knew I wanted an operating system from before Apple abandoned the Aqua design language. I suppose it depends on your definition, but that likely does mean Mavericks is the latest available. For my money though, El Capitan (10.11 to Mavericks' 10.9) was the local maxima (speed, stability, capability). I've no inkling what issues using that would entail—I had no idea that Mountain Lion had "a more capable version of QuickTime"—but my immediate response to this was wondering why not El Capitan. | ||||||||
▲ | delta_p_delta_x 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Strictly speaking, Mavericks (and Mountain Lion and Lion before it) were already some way through abandoning Aqua. Lion dropped the beautiful blue scroll bars that previous OS Xs had, replaced the pill-shaped buttons with rounded rectangles, and somewhat flattened the overall UI as well, though not to the extent that Yosemite did. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | terhechte 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
You needed to own a "QuickTime Pro" license in order to enable these features. I used to do all my simple video editing with it until they shelved it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | xeviousr 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We could benefit from a site that describes the best OS for any hardware and has scripts and instructions for how to mod them to be more efficient and up-to-date, with someone assigned to maintaining patches and tools for basic functionality you might need, but also having standalone, airgapped versions of each for longevity. Right now, this info is dispersed everywhere and it’s not the primary intent of archival sites to provide this. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | oreilles 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I would have went for Catalina. | ||||||||
▲ | boobsbr 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I'm still running El Capitan on my 2015 Air. |