| ▲ | romanovcode 5 days ago | |
Great idea, if you're fine with development time to take twice as long. | ||
| ▲ | ramon156 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
The alternative is a merge that potentially has more bugs. Trunk based is definitely not twice as long, rather 1.5x on average | ||
| ▲ | caspar 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
If you are used to PRs taking days (or over a week!) to merge, then I've found it's way faster to get someone to sit down and walk them through the code - which is not miles different from what's being proposed here. | ||
| ▲ | fogzen 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It might be worth it if it reduces bugs. If you’re running a payments company maybe working software is more important than saving a buck and shipping a day earlier. Braintree was a pair programming company for example. | ||