Yeah it’s just terrible. If Amazon knew what was good they’d just replace it with almost anything else. Heck just got all in on terraform and call it a day.

▲

mdaniel 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

This may be heresy in an AWS thread, but as a concept Bicep actually isn't terrible: https://github.com/Azure/bicep/blob/v0.37.4/src/Bicep.Cli.E2...

It does compile down to Azure Resource Manager's json DSL, so in that way close to Troposphere I guess, only both sides are official and not just some rando project that happens to emit yaml/json

The implementation, of course, is ... very Azure, so I don't mean to praise using it, merely that it's a better idea than rawdogging json

	▲	hnlmorg 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		I’ve heard so many bad things about bicep on Azure that I’m not convinced it’s an upgrade over TF. The syntax does look nicer but sadly that’s just a superficial improvement.

▲

hnlmorg 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They do contribute to the AWS provider for Terraform.

Also that have CDK which is a framework for writing IaC in Java/TypeScript, Go, Python, etc.

	▲	gigatexal 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Meh. The CDK doesn’t look terrible. It’s still not ideal. But even if this compiles to a mess of CF it’s still better than writing CF by hand and that’s only because CF is so bad to begin with. https://dev.to/kelvinskell/getting-started-with-aws-cdk-in-p...

▲

5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

mdaniel 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As for "go all in on terraform," I pray to all that is holy every night that terraform rots in the hell that spawned it. And that's not even getting into the rug pull parts, I mean the very idea of

1. I need a goddamn CLI to run it (versus giving someone a URL they can load in their tenant and have running resources afterward)

1. the goddamn CLI mandates live cloud credentials, but then stright-up never uses them to check a goddamn thing it intends to do to my cloud control plane

You may say "running 'plan' does" and I can offer 50+ examples clearly demonstrating that it does not catch the most facepalm of bugs

1. related to that, having a state file that believes it knows what exists in the world is just ludicrous and pain made manifest

1. a tool that thinks nuking things is an appropriate fix ... whew. Although I guess in our new LLM world, saying such things makes me the old person who should get onboard the "nothing matters" train

and the language is a dumpster, imho

▲

hnlmorg 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

There's a lot wrong with Terraform but I don't think you're being at all fair with your specific critisims here:

> 1. I need a goddamn CLI to run it (versus giving someone a URL they can load in their tenant and have running resources afterward)

CloudFormation is the only IaC that supports "running as a URL" and that's only because it's an AWS native solution. And CloudFormation is a hell of a lot more painful to write and slower to iterate on. So you're not any better off for using CF.

What usually happens with TF is you'd build a deploy pipeline. Thus you can test via the CLI then deploy via CI/CD. So you're not limited to just the CLI. But personally, I don't see the CLI as a limitation.

> the goddamn CLI mandates live cloud credentials, but then stright-up never uses them to check a goddamn thing it intends to do to my cloud control plane

All IaC requires live cloud credentials. It would be impossible for them to work without live credentials ;)

Terraform does do a lot of checking. I do agree there is a lot that the plan misses though. That's definitely frustrating. But it's a side effect of cloud vendors having arbitrary conditions that are hard to define and forever changing. You run into the same problem with any tool you'd use to provision. Heck, even manually deploying stuff from the web console sometimes takes a couple of tweaks to get right.

> 1. related to that, having a state file that believes it knows what exists in the world is just ludicrous and pain made manifest

This is a very strange complaint. Having a state file is the bare minimum any IaC NEEDS for it to be considered a viable option. If you don't like IaC tracking state then you're really little better off than managing resources manually.

> a tool that thinks nuking things is an appropriate fix ... whew.

This is grossly unfair. Terraform only destroys resources when:

1. you remove those resources from the source. Which is sensible because you're telling Terraform you no longer want those resources

2. when you make a change that AWS doesn't support doing on live resources. Thus the limitation isn't Terraform, it is AWS

In either scenario, the destroy is explicit in the plan and expected behaviour.

▲

mdaniel 4 days ago | parent [-]

> CloudFormation is the only IaC that supports "running as a URL"

Incorrect, ARM does too, they even have a much nicer icon for one click "Deploy to Azure" <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manag...> and as a concrete example (or whole repo of them): <https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/2db...>

> All IaC requires live cloud credentials. It would be impossible for them to work without live credentials ;)

Did you read the rest of the sentence? I said it's the worst of both worlds: I can't run "plan" without live creds, but then it doesn't use them to check jack shit. Also, to circle back to our CF and Bicep discussion, no, I don't need cloud creds to write code for those stacks - I need only creds to apply them

I don't need a state file for CF nor Bicep. Mysterious about that, huh?

	▲	hnlmorg 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Incorrect, ARM does too, they even have a much nicer icon for one click "Deploy to Azure" That’s Azure, not AWS. My point was to have “one click” HTTP installs you need native integration with the cloud vendor. For Azure it’s the clusterfuck that is Bicep. For AWS it’s the clusterfuck that is CF > I don't need a state file for CF nor Bicep. CF does have a state file, it’s just hidden from view. And bicep is shit precisely because it doesn’t track state. In fact the lack of a state file is the main complain against bicep and thus the biggest thing holding it back from wider adoption — despite being endorsed by Microsoft Azure.

▲

gchamonlive 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All Terraform does is build a DAG, compare it with the current state file and pass the changes down to the provider so it can translate to the correct sequence of interactions with the upstream API. Most of your criticism boils down to limitations of the cloud provider API and/or Terraform provider quality. It won't check for naming collision for instance, it assumes you know what you are doing.

Regarding HCL, I respect their decision to keep the language minimal, and for all it's worth you can go very, very far with the language expressions and using modules to abstract some logic, but I think it's a fair criticism for the language not to support custom functions and higher level abstractions.

▲

SvenL 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Amen, and I would add to that list “no, just because you use terraform doesn’t mean you can simply switch between cloud providers”.

▲

hnlmorg 5 days ago | parent [-]

Is there any IaC solutions where you can “simply switch between cloud providers”?

This isn’t a limitation of TF, it’s an intended consequence of cloud vendor lock in

▲

mdaniel 4 days ago | parent [-]

I believe the usual uninformed thinking is "terraform exists outside of AWS, so I can move off of AWS" versus "we have used CF or Bicep, now we're stuck" kind of deal

Which is to say both of you are correct, but OP was highlighting the improper expectations of "if we write in TF, sure it sucks balls but we can then just pivot to $other_cloud" not realizing it's untrue and now you've used a rusty paintbrush as a screwdriver

	▲	hnlmorg 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I don’t think that expectation exists with anyone with even the slightest understanding of IaC and systems. But maybe I’ve just been blessed to work with people who aren’t complete idiots?

▲

stogot 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn’t that what CDK was for?