▲ | swader999 4 days ago | |||||||
You're absolutely right but I wonder if we'll have to ditch the traditional code review for something else, perhaps automated, if this agentic way continues. | ||||||||
▲ | robbs 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> You're absolutely right Claude! Get off HN and get back to work. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | CuriouslyC 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
AI can actually review PRs decently when given enough context and detailed instructions. It doesn't eliminate the PR problem, but it can catch a lot of bugs and it can add comments to parts of the code that look questionable to instruct humans to manually verify. | ||||||||
▲ | mac-mc 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
You can also force the agent to write up a summary of the code change, reasoning, etc, fortunately, which can help with review. |