You've missed my point. I don't think any human who has a job at a law firm would ignore a sentence like that. I think any AI I've used has ignored explicit instructions of moderate severity. I'm not worried it'll hallucinate things into existence, I'm worried it'll ignore them out. Can't summarize without throwing away words. I don't trust it to choose the right ones.

And you've missed mine.

I don't think any human at any law firm, medical practice, major resource company, etc. that deals with volumes of documentation in the course of making multi million deals would _trust_ an associate / intern pool or an AI to create a perfect product that can be passed directly to a client without any form of checking and verification.

It's a _given_ that there will be shortfalls and errors and the procedures need to be sufficient to embrace an error prone distillation phase and a circle back and verify phase.

At least in my experience to date.

It's clear from the article that KPMG feel much the same way.