| ▲ | FirmwareBurner 6 days ago |
| >It should be RISC-V... who is in charge at Intel?? Why should it be that? What are your arguments? |
|
| ▲ | sylware 5 days ago | parent [-] |
| oh, you are new to HN, because you would not need to ask such question if you were reading HN in the last few years... You can start on risc-v wikipedia page and/or on the official risc-v web site. |
| |
| ▲ | nullpoint420 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I would say they’re smart to invest in ARM over RISC-V for the time being. It was hard enough to get the industry to support x86 and ARM64. I mean the Windows transition is still not fully complete, and they’ve been trying since Windows 8. | | |
| ▲ | sylware 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I would say otherwise. The future, if sane, is certainly not with a PI locked ISA like ARM all over again (look at x86). Actually, it looks like a super bad move from intel. |
|
|
