▲ | conductr 2 days ago | |||||||
1.6m in 40 years probably won’t move the needle much more than 100k does today. Besides that, we’re not trying to solve peoples distant retirements we’re trying to solve peoples lives today , or that’s how I interpret the article | ||||||||
▲ | toshinoriyagi 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
100K at 7% (market rate adjusted for inflation) is 1.6M after 40 years, so that would be 1.6M in today's buying power. Pretty good by the vast majority of peoples' standards. | ||||||||
|