I appreciate your comment, it drove me down a rabbit hole :-)

You were right that under the old interpretation, my app had no case. But that rabbit hole led me to the news that the interpretation itself has just been successfully challenged.

Judge Mehta found Google liable. The court has officially validated that the 'free vs. free' self-preferencing that killed my app is, in fact, illegal monopoly maintenance.

Fascinating to see a legal system's 'unhandled exception' get patched in real time.

p.s. Respect for your public comments here :-)