The last thing I'm going to care about comparing distros is whether they used the same naming pattern as Microsoft instead of Apple. To give credit to their author, it sounds like their name really is Anduin Xue and this is their OS, not that they intended for it to sound confusing. Not all that different than how Debian was named, beyond including OS at the end.

https://anduin.aiursoft.cn/page/about

▲

zem 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think the gp is complaining specifically about the "OS" bit; that makes it sound like a new operating system rather than a derivative linux distribution

	▲	zamadatix 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		The points are are the same specific topic. A distro is a superset of the OS bit and the latter is rarely distributed without the additional software, documentation, and configuration that make up a distro so, to me, it's more than fine to me to include OS in the name. Even to switch between one Debian derivative to another it's extraordinarily rare to not reinstall the OS as part of that swap, so why not name the whole solution according to what it includes?

▲

astrange 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The same naming pattern as Microsoft? Like a distro named Linux for Workgroups Lync 365?

	▲	5 days ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]